on two large-scale global trials1,2 FOR 1ST-LINE EGFR M+ mNSCLC VS CHEMOTHERAPY Median progression-free survival (PFS) in LUX-Lung 3
- 13.7 months median progression-free survival for Del 19 mutations with GILOTRIF vs
5.6 months with pemetrexed/cisplatin (n=170) (HR: 0.28; 95% CI, 0.18-0.44)1,3,4
- 10.8 months median PFS for L858R (exon 21 substitution) mutations with GILOTRIF vs
8.1 months with pemetrexed/cisplatin (n=138) (HR: 0.73; 95% CI, 0.46-1.17)1,3,4
in Del 191,2,5 FOR 1ST-LINE EGFR M+ mNSCLC VS CHEMOTHERAPY
33.3 months median overall survival (OS) in LUX-Lung 3 for Del 19 mutations
population with GILOTRIF 40 mg orally once daily (n=112) vs 21.1 months with
pemetrexed/cisplatin 500 mg/m2/75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks for up to 6 cycles (n=57)
(HR: 0.55; 95% CI, 0.36-0.79)1,2
- 45% reduction in risk of death vs pemetrexed/cisplatin
>4200 patients in clinical trials1 In LUX-Lung 3 patients with Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
- Most common adverse reactions (≤20%) were diarrhea, rash/acneiform dermatitis,
stomatitis, paronychia, dry skin, decreased appetite, nausea, vomiting, pruritis
7.9 months median OS in LUX-Lung 8 with GILOTRIF 40 mg orally once daily (n=398) vs
6.8 months with erlotinib 150 mg once daily (n=397) (HR: 0.81; 95% CI, 0.69-0.95)
- 19% reduction in risk of death vs erlotinib
- 2.4 months median PFS with afatinib vs 1.9 months with erlotinib (HR: 0.82; 95% CI,
of mutation status6 IN ADVANCED SqCC PROGRESSING AFTER CHEMOTHERAPY
- Serious adverse reactions occurred in 44% of patients treated with GILOTRIF1
- Treatment-related discontinuation due to any adverse reactions was similar in both arms
(20% vs 17% for GILOTRIF vs erlotinib)6
- In LUX-Lung 8 with previously treated metastatic squamous non-small cell lung cancer
the most common adverse reactions (≥20%) were diarrhea (75%), rash/acneiform
dermatitis (70%), stomatitis (30%), decreased appetite (25%), and nausea (21%)
severity of ARs7 IN A POST HOC ANALYSIS OF LUX-Lung 3
- Over half of patients reduced dose1,4
- The most frequent adverse reactions that led to dose reduction in the patients treated with
GILOTRIF were diarrhea (20%), rash/acne (19%), stomatitis (10%), and paronychia (14%)1
- The most frequent adverse reactions that led to dose reduction in the patients treated with
- Fewer patients experienced treatment-related grade ≥3 adverse reactions (diarrhea,
rash/acne, stomatitis, paronychia) with dose adjustment (n=89)7
with or without dose adjustments, based on
a post hoc analysis of LUX-Lung 37
- Median PFS was 11.3 for patients that dose adjusted to <40 mg within the first
6 months (n=105) and median PFS was 11.0 for patients that remained on initial dose
≥40 mg (n=124) (HR: 1.25; 95% CI, 0.91-1.72)
transition to a new dose
- Eliminates additional GILOTRIF co-pay in a given month for eligible patients
- Eligible patients receive a new dose of GILOTRIF—prepaid mailer will accompany newly
prescribed dose, allowing for the convenient return of unused tablets from the prior dose
- GILOTRIF is unlikely to affect the metabolism of other drugs that are substrates of
- GILOTRIF is unlikely to be impacted by the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs)8
- P-gp inhibitors can increase exposure to GILOTRIF1
- P-gp inducers can decrease exposure to GILOTRIF
IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION
WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS
- GILOTRIF can cause diarrhea which may be severe and can result in dehydration with or without renal impairment. In clinical studies, some of these cases were fatal.
- For patients who develop Grade 2 diarrhea lasting more than 48 hours or Grade 3 or greater diarrhea, withhold GILOTRIF until diarrhea resolves to Grade 1 or less, and then resume at a reduced dose.
- Provide patients with an anti-diarrheal agent (e.g., loperamide) for self-administration at the onset of diarrhea and instruct patients to continue anti-diarrheal until loose stools cease for 12 hours.
Bullous and Exfoliative Skin Disorders
- GILOTRIF can result in cutaneous reactions consisting of rash, erythema, and acneiform rash. In addition, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome was observed in clinical trials in patients taking GILOTRIF.
- Discontinue GILOTRIF in patients who develop life-threatening bullous, blistering, or exfoliating lesions. For patients who develop Grade 2 cutaneous adverse reactions lasting more than 7 days, intolerable Grade 2, or Grade 3 cutaneous reactions, withhold GILOTRIF. When the adverse reaction resolves to Grade 1 or less, resume GILOTRIF with appropriate dose reduction.
- Postmarketing cases of toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) and Stevens Johnson syndrome (SJS) have been reported in patients receiving GILOTRIF. Discontinue GILOTRIF if TEN or SJS is suspected.
Interstitial Lung Disease
- Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) or ILD-like adverse reactions (e.g., lung infiltration, pneumonitis, acute respiratory distress syndrome, or alveolitis allergic) occurred in patients receiving GILOTRIF in clinical trials. In some cases, ILD was fatal. The incidence of ILD appeared to be higher in Asian patients as compared to white patients.
- Withhold GILOTRIF during evaluation of patients with suspected ILD, and discontinue GILOTRIF in patients with confirmed ILD.
- Hepatic toxicity as evidenced by liver function tests abnormalities has been observed in patients taking GILOTRIF. In 4257 patients who received GILOTRIF across clinical trials, 9.7% had liver test abnormalities, of which 0.2% were fatal.
- Obtain periodic liver testing in patients during treatment with GILOTRIF. Withhold GILOTRIF in patients who develop worsening of liver function. Treatment should be discontinued in patients who develop severe hepatic impairment while taking GILOTRIF.
- Keratitis has been reported in patients taking GILOTRIF.
- Withhold GILOTRIF during evaluation of patients with suspected keratitis. If diagnosis of ulcerative keratitis is confirmed, treatment with GILOTRIF should be interrupted or discontinued. If keratitis is diagnosed, the benefits and risks of continuing treatment should be carefully considered. GILOTRIF should be used with caution in patients with a history of keratitis, ulcerative keratitis, or severe dry eye. Contact lens use is also a risk factor for keratitis and ulceration.
- GILOTRIF can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. Advise pregnant women and females of reproductive potential of the potential risk to a fetus.
- Advise females of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment, and for at least 2 weeks after the last dose of GILOTRIF. Advise female patients to contact their healthcare provider with a known or suspected pregnancy.
Adverse Reactions observed in clinical trials were as follows:
First-line treatment of EGFR mutation-positive, metastatic NSCLC
- In GILOTRIF-treated patients (n=229) the most common adverse reactions (≥20% all grades & vs pemetrexed/cisplatin-treated patients (n=111)) were diarrhea (96% vs 23%), rash/acneiform dermatitis (90% vs 11%), stomatitis (71% vs 15%), paronychia (58% vs 0%), dry skin (31% vs 2%), and pruritus (21% vs 1%). Other clinically important adverse reactions observed in patients treated with GILOTRIF include: decreased appetite (29%), nausea (25%), and vomiting (23%).
- Serious adverse reactions were reported in 29% of patients treated with GILOTRIF. The most frequent serious adverse reactions reported in patients treated with GILOTRIF were diarrhea (6.6%), vomiting (4.8%), and dyspnea, fatigue, and hypokalemia (1.7% each). Fatal adverse reactions in GILOTRIF-treated patients included pulmonary toxicity/ILD-like adverse reactions (1.3%), sepsis (0.43%), and pneumonia (0.43%).
- More GILOTRIF-treated patients (2.2%) experienced ventricular dysfunction (defined as diastolic dysfunction, left ventricular dysfunction, or ventricular dilation; all < Grade 3) compared to chemotherapy-treated patients (0.9%).
Previously Treated Metastatic Squamous NSCLC
- In GILOTRIF-treated patients (n=392) the most common adverse reactions (≥20% all grades & vs erlotinib-treated patients (n=395)) were diarrhea (75% vs 41%), rash/acneiform dermatitis (70% vs 70%), stomatitis (30% vs 11%), decreased appetite (25% vs 26%), nausea (21% vs 16%).
- Serious adverse reactions were reported in 44% of patients treated with GILOTRIF. The most frequent serious adverse reactions reported in patients treated with GILOTRIF were pneumonia (6.6%), diarrhea (4.6%), and dehydration and dyspnea (3.1% each). Fatal adverse reactions in GILOTRIF-treated patients included ILD (0.5%), pneumonia (0.3%), respiratory failure (0.3%), acute renal failure (0.3%), and general physical health deterioration (0.3%).
Effect of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) Inhibitors and Inducers
- Concomitant use of P-gp inhibitors (including but not limited to ritonavir, cyclosporine A, ketoconazole, itraconazole, erythromycin, verapamil, quinidine, tacrolimus, nelfinavir, saquinavir, and amiodarone) with GILOTRIF can increase exposure to afatinib.
- Concomitant use of P-gp inducers (including but not limited to rifampicin, carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, and St. John’s wort) with GILOTRIF can decrease exposure to afatinib.
USE IN SPECIFIC POPULATIONS
- Because of the potential for serious adverse reactions in nursing infants from GILOTRIF, lactating women should not breastfeed during treatment with GILOTRIF and for 2 weeks after the final dose.
Females and Males of Reproductive Potential
- GILOTRIF may reduce fertility in females and males of reproductive potential. It is not known if the effects on fertility are reversible.
- Patients with severe renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] 15 to 29 mL/min /1.73 m2) have a higher exposure to afatinib than patients with normal renal function. Administer GILOTRIF at a starting dose of 30 mg once daily in patients with severe renal impairment. GILOTRIF has not been studied in patients with eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m2 or who are on dialysis.
- GILOTRIF has not been studied in patients with severe (Child Pugh C) hepatic impairment. Closely monitor patients with severe hepatic impairment and adjust GILOTRIF dose if not tolerated.
INDICATIONS AND USAGE
- GILOTRIF is indicated for the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose tumors have non-resistant epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations as detected by an FDA-approved test. Limitation of Use: Safety and efficacy of GILOTRIF have not been established in patients whose tumors have resistant EGFR mutations.
- GILOTRIF is indicated for the treatment of patients with metastatic squamous NSCLC progressing after platinum-based chemotherapy.
GF PROF ISI 01.12.18
References: 1. Gilotrif® (afatinib) tablets Prescribing Information. Ridgefield, CT: Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2. Yang JC-H, Wu Y-L, Schuler M, et al. Afatinib versus cisplatin-based chemotherapy for EGFR mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma (LUX-Lung 3 and LUX-Lung 6): analysis of overall survival data from two randomised, phase 3 trials. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(2):141-151. 3. Sequist LV, Yang JC, Yamamoto N, et al. Phase III study of afatinib or cisplatin plus pemetrexed in patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR mutations. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(27):3327-3334. 4. Data on file. Boehringer Ingelheim. CTR. 5. Lee CK, Wu YL, Ding PN, et al. Impact of specific epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and clinical characteristics on outcomes after treatment with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors versus chemotherapy in EGFR-mutant lung cancer: a meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(17):1958-1965. 6. Soria J-C, Felip E, Cobo M, et al. Afatinib versus erlotinib as second-line treatment of patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the lung (LUX-Lung 8): an open-label randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:897-907. 7. Yang JC, Sequist LV, Zhou C, et al. Effect of dose adjustment on the safety and efficacy of afatinib for EGFR mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma: post hoc analyses of the randomized LUX-Lung 3 and 6 trials [published online September 6, 2016]. Ann Oncol. 2016. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw322. 8. Peters S, Zimmermann S, Adjei AA. Oral epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: comparative pharmacokinetics and drug-drug interactions. Cancer Treat Rev. 2014;40(8):917-926. 9. Sharma SV, Bell DW, Settleman J, Haber DA. Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in lung cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7(3):169-181. 10. Data on file. Boehringer Ingelheim. Other mutations PFS table. 11. Wu YL, Zhou C, Hu CP, et al. Afatinib versus cisplatin plus gemcitabine for first-line treatment of Asian patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring EGFR mutations (LUX-Lung 6): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(2):213-222.
This web site is intended for US residents only. Please visit your country's web site for information applicable to your local labeling.